rfc9714v4.txt | rfc9714.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
skipping to change at line 97 ¶ | skipping to change at line 97 ¶ | |||
flows. | flows. | |||
This document defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance | This document defines the encapsulation for MPLS performance | |||
measurement with the Alternate-Marking Method, which performs flow- | measurement with the Alternate-Marking Method, which performs flow- | |||
based packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on the MPLS | based packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on the MPLS | |||
traffic. The encapsulation defined in this document supports | traffic. The encapsulation defined in this document supports | |||
performance monitoring at the intermediate nodes and MPLS flow | performance monitoring at the intermediate nodes and MPLS flow | |||
identification at both transport and service layers. | identification at both transport and service layers. | |||
Note that in parallel to the work of this document, there is ongoing | Note that in parallel to the work of this document, there is ongoing | |||
work on MPLS Network Actions (MNAs) [RFC9613]. The MPLS performance | work, e.g., [MNA-PM-with-AMM], regarding MPLS Network Actions (MNAs) | |||
measurement with the Alternate-Marking Method can also be achieved by | [RFC9613]. The MPLS performance measurement with the Alternate- | |||
MNA encapsulation. In addition, MNA will provide a broader use-case | Marking Method can also be achieved by MNA encapsulation. In | |||
applicability. That means the MNA encapsulation is expected to | addition, MNA will provide a broader use-case applicability. That | |||
provide a more advanced solution. Once published as an RFC, it is | means the MNA encapsulation is expected to provide a more advanced | |||
agreed that this document will be made Historic. | solution. If [MNA-PM-with-AMM] is published as an RFC, the status of | |||
this RFC will be reviewed and possibly changed to Historic. | ||||
2. Conventions Used in This Document | 2. Conventions Used in This Document | |||
2.1. Abbreviations | 2.1. Abbreviations | |||
ACL: Access Control List | ACL: Access Control List | |||
BoS: Bottom of Stack | BoS: Bottom of Stack | |||
cSPL: Composite Special Purpose Label, the combination of the | cSPL: Composite Special Purpose Label, the combination of the | |||
skipping to change at line 552 ¶ | skipping to change at line 553 ¶ | |||
10.2. Informative References | 10.2. Informative References | |||
[ALT-MARK] Fioccola, G., Zhu, K., Graf, T., Nilo, M., and L. Zhang, | [ALT-MARK] Fioccola, G., Zhu, K., Graf, T., Nilo, M., and L. Zhang, | |||
"Alternate Marking Deployment Framework", Work in | "Alternate Marking Deployment Framework", Work in | |||
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark- | Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark- | |||
deployment-02, 9 October 2024, | deployment-02, 9 October 2024, | |||
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm- | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm- | |||
alt-mark-deployment-02>. | alt-mark-deployment-02>. | |||
[MNA-PM-with-AMM] | ||||
Cheng, W., Min, X., Gandhi, R., and G. Mirsky, "MNA for | ||||
Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method", | ||||
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-cx-mpls-mna- | ||||
inband-pm-05, 21 October 2024, | ||||
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cx-mpls-mna- | ||||
inband-pm-05>. | ||||
[RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual | [RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual | |||
Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026, | Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005, | DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4026>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4026>. | |||
[RFC6790] Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and | [RFC6790] Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and | |||
L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding", | L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding", | |||
RFC 6790, DOI 10.17487/RFC6790, November 2012, | RFC 6790, DOI 10.17487/RFC6790, November 2012, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6790>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6790>. | |||
End of changes. 2 change blocks. | ||||
6 lines changed or deleted | 15 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. |